United States of America v. Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra, a.k.a. Carlos Jonathan Becerra, a.k.a. Jonathan…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CARLOS JONATHAN GONZALEZ
BECERRA, a.k.a. Carlos Jonathan Becerra,
a.k.a. Jonathan Becerra, a.k.a. Carlos
Jonathan Gonzalez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18-50155
D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00812-DSF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2019**
Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra appeals from the revocation of supervised
release and the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Becerra’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 19 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-50155
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Becerra the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. However,
the court has considered Becerra’s letter dated July 27, 2018.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --