Robert M. Mead v. Carolyn Inez Williams

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT M. MEAD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN INEZ WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 21-15368
D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00578-DB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Deborah L. Barnes, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted February 15, 2022***
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Robert M. Mead appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting
defendant’s post-judgment motion in Mead’s action alleging federal and state law
claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 21-15368
In its order, the district court clarified that the parties’ state court case, In re
Marriage of Mead and Williams-Mead, was not removed to the district court. For
the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, we affirm.
Mead’s motion to recall the mandate in appeal No. 20-17370 and to
consolidate that appeal with this appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --