Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.

CourtListener 3327481Connappct8 févr. 1984

Texte intégral

Per Curiam.

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.