Deputy v. Fox Rothschild LLP

CourtListener 10182458Del31 oct. 2024

Texte intégral

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JAY DEPUTY, §
§ No. 275, 2024
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below–Court of Chancery
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ C.A. No. 2022-0469
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, ITS §
NAMED ASSOCIATES AND §
PARTNER(S) ET AL., §
§
Defendants Below, §
Appellees. §

Submitted: October 18, 2024
Decided: October 31, 2024

ORDER

On September 30, 2024, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, sent by

certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing fee or file a motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant received the notice, as evidenced by the

certified return receipt filed with the Court on October 7, 2024. A timely response

to the notice to show cause was due on or before October 17, 2024. To date, the

appellant has not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis, or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this action

is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is

DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
Justice

2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.