Velez v. State

CourtListener 10740348Del20 nov. 2025

Texte intégral

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WILSON VELEZ, §
§
Defendant Below, § No. 441, 2025
Appellant, §
§ Court Below: Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. I.D. Nos. 2212006162
§ 2303008901 (N)
Appellee. §

Submitted: November 14, 2025
Decided: November 20, 2025

ORDER

On October 27, 2025, this Court received a notice of appeal from a Superior

Court order dated September 30, 2025, which adopted a Commissioner’s

recommendation that the court deny the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

The Superior Court docket reflected that on October 1, 2025, the court had

withdrawn the September 30 order and directed further briefing on the appellant’s

objections to the Commissioner’s report, which the prothonotary had received on

September 29. The Clerk of this Court therefore issued a notice, sent by certified

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

based on this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain a criminal interlocutory appeal.

The certified-mail receipt indicates that the notice to show cause was delivered on
November 3. The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause

within the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura
Justice

2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.