CourtListener 10769667•Dawson, Alice v. Trey Michaelson
Texte intégral
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ALICE DAWSON,1 §
§ No. 477, 2025
Respondent Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below–Family Court
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ File No. CN20-02979
TREY MICHAELSON, § Petition No. 25-21673
§
Petitioner Below, §
Appellee. §
Submitted: December 30, 2025
Decided: January 5, 2026
Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response,
it appears to the Court that:
(1) On November 24, 2025, the appellant, Alice Dawson, filed a notice of
appeal from a November 14, 2025 Family Court case management conference held
on the appellee’s pending petition for a rule to show cause. The Chief Deputy Clerk
issued a notice to Dawson to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed
for her failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from
1
The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
an interlocutory order. Dawson has responded to the notice to show cause but does
not address the interlocutory nature of this appeal.
(2) An order constitutes a final judgment when it “leaves nothing for future
determination or consideration.”2 Any decision made by the Family Court at the
November 14 case management conference is interlocutory because the Family
Court did not finally resolve the merits of the appellee’s petition for a rule to show
cause.
(3) Absent compliance with Rule 42, the appellate jurisdiction of this Court
is limited to the review of final trial court orders. 3 Dawson’s failure to comply with
Rule 42 leaves this Court without jurisdiction to hear her interlocutory appeal.
Dawson may appeal once the Family Court issues a final order in the rule-to-show-
cause proceedings.4
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal be
DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rule 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor
Justice
2
Werb v. D’Alessandro, 606 A.2d 117, 119 (Del. 1992).
3
Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982).
4
We note that a hearing on the petition is scheduled for January 14, 2026.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.