Gingell v. Panichelli

CourtListener 10864692Fladistctapp27 mai 2026

Texte intégral

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT

JENNIFER GINGELL,

Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE PANICHELLI,

Appellee.

No. 2D2025-2266

May 27, 2026

Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Knute J. Nathe, Judge.

Jennifer Gingell, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the
appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so
as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual
context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial
judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court
should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the
appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.").
LaROSE, LABRIT, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.