Florida Public Service Commission native order document 02660-2026

Order No. PSC-2022-0232-CFO-EIFlapubserv

Texte intégral

FILED 5/7/2026
DOCUMENT NO. 02660-2026
FPSC 	- COMMISSION CLERK
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
In re: Petition to approve transaction for 	DOCKET NO. 20190140-EI
accelerated decommissioning services at CR3 	ORDER NO. P SC-2026-0 124-CFO-EI
facility, transfer of title to spent fuel and 	ISSUED: May 	7, 2026
associated assets, and assumption of operations
of CR3 	facility pursuant to the NRC license,
and request for waiver from future application
of Rule 25-6.04365, F.A.C. 	for nuclear
decommissioning study, by Duke Energy
Florida, LLC._
ORDER GRANTING DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA. LLC’S
THIRD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION
(DOCUMENT NO, 03179-2020, X-REF. 03677-2020)
On February 27, 2026, pursuant to Section 366.093, Florida Statutes 	(F.S.), and Rule 25-
22.006, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), Duke Energy Florida, LLC (DEF) 	filed 	its Third
Request 	for 	Extension 	of 	Confidential 	Classification 	(Request) 	of 	portions 	of 	the 	rebuttal
testimony 	of Terry Hobbs and 	Jeff Adix 	filed on 	June 	18, 	2020, 	as 	well 	as 	Exhibit 	(JA-2)
(Document No. 03179-2020). 	On 	July 	9, 2020, a revised Exhibit No. 	(JA-2) was 	filed, along
with a revised Exhibit A 	to 	the Request. 	(Document No. 03677-2020). 	These materials were
originally granted confidentiality by Order No. PSC-2020-03 52-CFO-EI, issued October 9, 2020.
DEF’s 	First Request for Extension of Confidential Classification for this material was granted by
Order No. PSC-2022-0232-CFO-EI, issued June 27, 2022. DEF’s Second 	Request for Extension
of Confidential Classification 	for 	this material was granted by Order No. PSC-2024-0387-CFO-
EI, issued September 	3, 2024.
Request for Confidential Classification
DEF 	contends 	that 	the 	information 	contained 	in 	portions of the 	rebuttal 	testimony of
Terry Hobbs and 	Jeff Adix 	filed on June 	18, 2020, 	as well 	as 	the 	original and revised Exhibit
(JA-2), 	more 	specifically 	described 	in 	Exhibit C 	to 	its 	Request, 	continues 	to 	constitute
proprietary confidential business information 	entitled 	to protection under Section 366.093, 	F.S.,
and Rule 25-22.006, F.A.C. DEF asserts 	that 	this information 	is intended to be and 	is treated by
DEF as private and has not been publicly disclosed.
The information contained 	in portions of the rebuttal testimony of Terry Hobbs and Jeff
Adix, 	as 	well 	as 	the 	original and 	revised 	Exhibit 	(JA-2), 	consists of commercially 	sensitive
financial information concerning the Decommissioning Services Agreement (DSA) entered into
between DEF 	and 	Accelerated Decommissioning 	Partners, LLC (ADP) and 	other 	associated
agreements between ADP and 	its 	affiliates 	for 	the decommissioning of DEF’s 	Crystal River 3
nuclear 	facility. DEF 	states that 	it 	is contractually required to keep this information confidential.
Further, much of this material 	is 	the 	subject of confidentiality orders previously issued 	in 	this
docket. 	DEF 	states 	that 	the 	disclosure 	of 	this 	information would 	not 	only 	impair DEF’s
competitive business 	advantages but 	those of ADP and 	its 	affiliates. 	For 	these 	reasons, DEF
argues that this information 	is protected by Sections 366.093(3 )(d) and (e), F.S.
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0124-CFO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20190140-EI
PAGE 2
Ruling
Section 366.093(1), F.S., provides that records the Florida Public Service Commission
(Commission) has found to contain proprietary business information shall be kept confidential
and shall be exempt from Chapter 119, F.S. 	Section 366.093(3), F.S., defines proprietary
confidential business information as information that is intended to be and is treated by the
company as private, in that disclosure of the information would cause harm to the company’s
ratepayers or business operations, and has not been voluntarily disclosed to the public. 	Section
366.093(3), F.S., provides that proprietary confidential business information includes, but is not
limited to:
(d) Information concerning bids or other contractual data, the disclosure of which
would impair the efforts of the public utility or its affiliates to contract for goods
or services on favorable terms.
(e) 	Information relating to competitive interests, the disclosure of which would
impair the competitive business of the provider of the information.
Upon review, it appears the above-referenced information continues to satisfy the criteria
set forth in Section 366.093(3), F.S., for classification as proprietary confidential business
information. The information contained in portions of the rebuttal testimony of Terry Hobbs and
Jeff Adix filed on June 18, 2020, as well as the original and revised Exhibit (JA-2), if disclosed,
could adversely impact DEF’s competitive interests as well as the competitive interests of ADP
and its parent and affiliate companies. Thus, the information identified in Document No. 03179-
2020, x-ref. 03677-2020, shall be granted confidential classification.
Pursuant to Section 366.093(4), F.S., the information for which confidential classification
is granted herein shall remain protected from disclosure for a period of 18 months from the date
of issuance of this Order. At the conclusion of the 18-month period, the confidential information
will no longer be exempt from Section 119.07(1), F.S., unless DEF or another affected person
shows, and the Commission finds, that the records continue to contain proprietary confidential
business information.
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED by Commissioner Mike La Rosa, as Prehearing Officer, that Duke Energy
Florida, LLC’s Third Request for Extension of Confidential Classification of Document No.
03179-2020, x-ref. 03677-2020, is granted, as set forth herein. It is further
ORDERED that the information in Document No. 03179-2020, x-ref. 03677-2020, for
which confidential classification has been granted, shall remain protected from disclosure for a
period of 18 months from the date of issuance of this Order. It is further
ORDERED that this Order shall be the only notification by the Commission to the parties
of the date of declassification of the materials discussed herein.
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0124-CFO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20190140-EI
PAGE 3
By ORDER of Commissioner Mike La Rosa, as Prehearing Officer, this 7th day of May,
2026.
MIKE LA ROSA
Commissioner and Prehearing Officer
Florida Public Service Commission
2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
(850) 413-6770
www.floridapsc.com
Copies furnished: 	A copy of this document is
provided to the parties of record at the time of
issuance and, if applicable, interested persons.
SBr
NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Florida Public Service Commission is required by Section 120.569(1), Florida
Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission orders
that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the procedures and
time limits that apply. 	This notice should not be construed to mean all requests for an
administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought.
Mediation may be available on a case-by-case basis. 	If mediation is conducted, it does
not affect a substantially interested person's right to a hearing.
Any 	party 	adversely 	affected 	by 	this 	order, 	which 	is 	preliminary, 	procedural 	or
intermediate in nature, may request: (1) reconsideration within 10 days pursuant to Rule 25-
22.0376, Florida Administrative Code; or (2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court, in
the case of an electric, gas or telephone utility, or the First District Court of Appeal, in the case
of a water or wastewater utility. 	A motion for reconsideration shall be filed with the Office of
Commission Clerk, in the form prescribed by Rule 25-22.0376, Florida Administrative Code.
Judicial review of a preliminary, procedural or intermediate ruling or order is available if review
of the final action will not provide an adequate remedy. Such review may be requested from the
appropriate court, as described above, pursuant to Rule 9.100, Florida Rules of Appellate
Procedure.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.