Howell v. Municipality of Anchorage et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
KELSEY HOWELL, as P.R. for
Estate of Dan Demott, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, et
al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:20-cv-000301-SLG
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE: TESTIMONY OF CERTAIN
WITNESSES
Before the Court at Docket 80 is Defendants’ Motion in Limine: Testimony
of Certain Witnesses. Plaintiffs responded in opposition to the motion at Docket 82
to which Defendants replied at Docket 84.
The motion is denied as moot with respect to Agatha Bybee, as Plaintiff has
recently indicated she does not intend to call this person to testify at trial.
With respect to the testimony of Justin Charlie, the Court denies the motion
without prejudice to Defendants raising objections to specific questions that may
be posed to this witness at trial. 	That being said, the Court is likely to permit
questions of this witness as to information he knew about his father that he could
have conveyed to the APD officers if it had been requested of him, as well as the
information that he did in fact convey.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of March 2024.
/s/ Sharon L. Gleason
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:20-cv-00301-SLG Document 86 Filed 03/12/24 Page 1 of 1