Cottle v. O'Malley

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
KEVIN WAYNE COTTLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARTIN O’MALLEY,
Defendant. Case No. 5:23-cv-00003-SLG
ORDER RE STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND
Before the Court at Docket 14 is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Remand.
Good cause being shown, the motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to sentence four of
42. U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS ORDERED this matter is reversed and remanded for
further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will
be directed to offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing; ensure a significant
number of jobs are available or exist in the national and/or regional economy that
Plaintiff can still perform, given his age, education, work experience, and residual
functional capacity; and ensure the vocational expert resolves any and all conflicts
with the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT), consistent with Social Security
Ruling 00-4p.
Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff’s application for
costs and attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
Case 5:23-cv-00003-SLG Document 15 Filed 03/06/24 Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:23-cv-00003-SLG, Cottle v. O’Malley
Order re Stipulated Motion for Remand
Page 2 of 2
DATED this 6th day of March 2024, at Anchorage, Alaska.
/s/ Sharon L. Gleason
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:23-cv-00003-SLG Document 15 Filed 03/06/24 Page 2 of 2