Brown v. Watkins et al

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document6- Filed 10/29/25 Page 1of2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION
TYLER BROWN PLAINTIFF
v. Case No. 4:25-cv-00438-JM
WATKINS, et al. DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Tyler Brown (“Plaintiff”) has not responded to the Court’s July 9, 2025, Order directing
him to file an Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 5). The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to
do so could result in the dismissal of his Complaint without prejudice. (/d.).

Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and
Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows:

It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk

and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to

monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . .

. . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to

within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. .. .

Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, his Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered

frivolous and not in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29" day of October, 2025.

CO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document6- Filed 10/29/25 Page 2 of 2