1:24-cv-01499•Pullam v. C H Rey Transport, Inc., et al.
Texte intégral
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THOMAS PULLAM, Plaintiff, v. C H REY TRANSPORT, INC. and REINALDO FRIAS, Defendants. Case No. 1:24-cv-01499-HBK ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME (Doc. 60) Before the Court is the Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time filed by Plaintiff’s attorney of record, Matthew J. Kracht of Silva Injury Law, Inc. (“Counsel”). (Doc. 60). The pretrial conference is scheduled for October 23, 2026, and the jury trial for November 9, 2026. (Doc. 12). On October 12,2026, Counsel filed a motion to withdraw from representing of Plaintiff. (Doc. 59). That same day, Counsel filed this ex parte application, explaining that Plaintiff discharged him in writing but has neither signed a substitution of attorney form nor stipulated to a shortened briefing schedule for the motion to withdraw. (Doc. 60 at 2–3). Counsel requests a shortened briefing schedule and decision on the motion to withdraw without oral argument because the motion turns solely on Plaintiff’s written discharge of Counsel and the pretrial conference is imminent. (Id.). Counsel submitted a supporting declaration. (Id. at 4–5). Case 1:24-cv-01499-HBK Document 61 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 The Court finds good cause to grant the application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Counsel’s Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time (Doc. 60) is GRANTED. 2. The Court finds the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (Doc. 59) suitable for decision WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. 3. Plaintiff and Defendants may file an opposition to the Motion to Withdraw within three (3) days after service of this Order. If an opposition is filed, Counsel may file a reply within three (3) days after service of the opposition. 4. Counsel shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of this Order by email and by U.S. mail to Plaintiff’s address of record. 5. All existing deadlines and scheduled dates remain in effect. Dated: October 13, 2026 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 1:24-cv-01499-HBK Document 61 Filed 10/13/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.