(PC) Davis v. Tuolumne County et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTHONY DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:25-cv-00925-JLT-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
(ECF No. 56, 57)
Pending before the Court is a motion from Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis, seeking to modify certain dates in the scheduling order. (ECF No. 56.)
Defendant has filed a limited opposition, not seeking to oppose the extension in and of itself but
seeking a continuance as well of the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 57.)
Upon review, the Court GRANTS the motion (ECF No. 56) and ORDERS the following
dates in the scheduling order are modified:
1. The close of discovery is continued to November 22, 2026;
2. The dispositive motion deadline is continued to February 3, 2027; and
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
Case 1:25-cv-00925-JLT-SAB Document 58 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3. The scheduling order otherwise remains controlling. (ECF No. 19.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00925-JLT-SAB Document 58 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 2