LeGrand et al v. Abbott Laboratories

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of
 California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CONDALISA LEGRAND,
Plaintiff,
v.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 205
On October 13, 2025, Plaintiff Condalisa LeGrand filed an Administrative Motion to File
Under Seal, seeking to seal her Renewed Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 205-3) because
it discusses and quotes from documents the Court has previously determined warrant sealing.
ECF No. 205. Defendant Abbott Laboratories filed a response requesting that LeGrand’s renewed
motion remain under seal. ECF No. 206. The Court has already determined that the information
within the renewed motion should be sealed. See ECF Nos. 175, 202. LeGrand does not
challenge the Court’s prior Order, and Abbott maintains that such information should remain
under seal because it reveals non-public information about its business strategy related to
marketing of its Ensure products and its market research and analysis. See ECF No. 206.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS LeGrand’s administrative motion to file under seal as to
her renewed motion (ECF No. 205-3). As a redacted version of the renewed motion has already
been filed on the public docket (ECF No. 204), no further action is needed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2026
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-05815-TSH Document 223 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1