Mobley v. Workday, Inc.

3:23-cv-00770Cand23 déc. 2025

Texte intégral

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEREK MOBLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORKDAY, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 23-cv-00770-RFL
ORDER REGARDING WEBSITE
DISPUTES
Re: Dkt. Nos. 223, 224
Having reviewed the parties’ statements (Dkt. Nos. 223–224), the following Order is
entered:
1. Plaintiffs may provide a fillable Consent to Join Form directly on the website as
proposed. The website and accompanying long form notice provide sufficient
context for the form.
2. Use of the “logo” and “shaded box with the text ‘Court Authorized
Notice/Workday Applicants 40+/Visit workdaycase.com for the full notice and
forms’” is authorized. These items are neither misleading nor prejudicial to
Workday.
3. The capture of electronic signatures via checkbox, a practice that is routinely used
in online agreements, is authorized. The requirement that individuals provide
their date of birth and contact information prior to signing is a sufficient safeguard
to avoid fraud and/or non-human submissions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 23, 2025
RITA F. LIN
United States District Judge
Case 3:23-cv-00770-RFL Document 225 Filed 12/23/25 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.