Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.130.100.4

3:26-cv-11104Cand15 oct. 2026

Texte intégral

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP
ADDRESS 24.130.100.4,
Defendant.
Case No. 26-cv-11104-TSH
ORDER GRANTING EX-PARTE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO
A RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 8
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application for Leave to
Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) Conference, and the
Court being duly advised does FIND, ORDER AND ADJUDGE:
1. Plaintiff has established “good cause” exists to serve a third-party subpoena on the
internet service provider, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (the “ISP”). See Gillespie v.
Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 2026 WL 1785118, at
*2 (N.D. Cal. June 22, 2026); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address
71.198.62.207, 2026 WL 1747770, at *2 (N.D. Cal. June 17, 2026).
2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide the
true name and address of the Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP address as set forth on
Exhibit A to the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach a copy of this Order to the subpoena;
3. Plaintiff may also serve a Rule 45 subpoena in the same manner on any service provider
that is identified in response to a subpoena as a provider of Internet services to the Defendant;
4. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator” under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5),1 the ISP shall
1 “[T]he term ‘cable operator’ means any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable
service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant
Case 3:26-cv-11104-TSH Document 9 Filed 10/15/26 Page 1 of 2
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B)2 by sending a copy of this Order to the Defendant; and
5. The ISP shall serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this order on the
subscriber within 30 days of the date of service on the ISP. The ISP may serve the subscribers
using any reasonable means, including written notice sent to the subscriber’s last known address,
transmitted either by first-class mail or via overnight service.
6. Each subscriber and the ISP shall have 30 days from the date of service upon him, her,
or it to file any motions in this court contesting the subpoena (including a motion to quash or
modify the subpoena). If the 30-day period lapses without the subscriber contesting the subpoena,
the ISP shall have 10 days to produce to Plaintiff the information responsive to the subpoena with
respect to that subscriber.
7. The ISP shall preserve all subpoenaed information pending the ISP’s delivering such
information to Plaintiff or the final resolution of a timely filed motion to quash the subpoena with
respect to such information.
8. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena
served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing its rights as set forth in the
Complaint. Plaintiff may not publicly disclose the information obtained based on this subpoena
without leave of the Court—at least until the Doe defendant has had an opportunity to file a
motion to proceed anonymously, or further discovery has been taken. All references to
Defendant’s identity must be redacted and filed UNDER SEAL until further notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 15, 2026
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any
arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system.” 47 U.S.C. § 522(5).
2 “A cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying] information if the disclosure is ...
made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such
order by the person to whom the order is directed.” 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B).
Case 3:26-cv-11104-TSH Document 9 Filed 10/15/26 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.