Bachmann et al v. United States of America

UPDATED JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES AND
HEARING; ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Case No. 22-cv-6250-ASK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MARYANNE B. COOPER, SBN215563
MILES B. COOPER, SBN209085
ANDREA G. POSEY, SBN282540
COOPERS LLP
2261 Market Street #330
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: 415-434-2111
Facsimile: 415-434-2112
SBA@coopers.law
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, PHILIPPE BACHMANN,
MEGAN BACHMANN, and minors J.B. and H.B
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PHILIPPE BACHMANN, MEGAN
BACHMANN, J.B., a minor, by his
guardian ad litem MEGAN BACHMANN,
and H.B., a minor, by her guardian ad
litem MEGAN BACHMANN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
BURLESON CONSULTING, INC., AND
HTA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:22-cv-06250-ASK
Assigned to Magistrate Judge
Ajay S. Krishnan
UPDATED JOINT STIPULATION
REGARDING DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINES AND
HEARING; ORDER (AS
MODIFIED)
Case filed: October 20, 2022
Trial date: April 13, 2026
The parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this JOINT
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER concerning deadlines for responses, reply,
and hearing in regard to Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’s Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. ECF No. 96. This joint stipulation
is made pursuant to the commentary provided under Rule 7-2 of this Court’s Local
Rules.
Currently pending before this Court is a joint discovery dispute letter. ECF
No. 100. Plaintiffs contend the discovery dispute letter concerns documents and
Case 4:22-cv-06250-ASK Document 104 Filed 01/23/26 Page 1 of 4

-2-
UPDATED JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES AND
HEARING; ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Case No. 22-cv-6250-ASK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
information that they will require to dispute Defendant United States of America’s
Motion to Dismiss. The United States disagrees that the documents at issue in the
discovery dispute letter are relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims and contends that they
have no bearing on the pending motion to dismiss. Nevertheless, in the interest of
compromise, the United States is agreeable to staying the deadline for responses
and replies.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST, that the response,
reply, and hearing deadlines and dates for Defendant UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA’s Motion to Dismiss are vacated. After the Court issues a decision on the
pending discovery dispute letter, the parties will submit a stipulated briefing
schedule for the Court’s consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: January 23, 2026 	COOPERS LLP
By:________________________________
Andrea G. Posey
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PHILIPPE BACHMANN, MEGAN
BACHMANN, and minors J.B. and
H.B.
DATED: January 23, 2026 	CRAIG H. MISSAKIAN
United States Attorney
By:________________________________
Jevechius D. Bernardoni
Attorneys for Defendant USA
Case 4:22-cv-06250-ASK Document 104 Filed 01/23/26 Page 2 of 4

-3-
UPDATED JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES AND
HEARING; ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Case No. 22-cv-6250-ASK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: January 23, 2026 	WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
By:________________________________
DERRICK S. LOWE
Attorneys for Defendant HTA
SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC.
DATED: January 23, 2026 	TRESSLER LLP
By:________________________________
RENA G. SERA
Attorneys for Defendant BURLESON
CONSULTING, INC
Case 4:22-cv-06250-ASK Document 104 Filed 01/23/26 Page 3 of 4

-4-
UPDATED JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES AND
HEARING; ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Case No. 22-cv-6250-ASK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
The above STIPULATION is approved. The deadlines for the response and
reply to Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA's Motion to Dismiss, and the
corresponding hearing date, are hereby vacated. Within seven days after the Court
issues a decision on the pending discovery dispute letter, the parties must submit a
stipulated briefing schedule for the Court’s consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 23, 2026 	_____________________________
Hon. Ajay S. Krishnan
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 4:22-cv-06250-ASK Document 104 Filed 01/23/26 Page 4 of 4