4:25-cv-08462•Singh et al v. Bondi et al
Texte intégral
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL ., Plaintiffs, vs. PAM B ONDI , ET AL ., Defendants. Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR O RDER DISMISSING CASE On December 17, 2025, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiffs were ordered to respond by no later than December 22, 2025, and were warned that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file a response. Pursuant to the Court’s December 17, 2025 order, this case is DISMISSED. The clerk shall close the action. I T I S S O O RDERED. Dated: February 20, 2026 YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 12 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.