Shokri Varniab et al v. Edlow et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ZAHRA SHOKRI VARNIAB, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOSEPH B. EDLOW, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 25-cv-10602-SVK
ORDER FOLLOWING MARCH 24,
2026 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
The Court held a Case Management Conference on March 24, 2026. Before the
conference, the Parties reported that: (1) USCIS has denied Plaintiffs’ I-485 and I-765
applications; (2) Plaintiffs intend to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”); and
(3) Defendants take the position that this case is now moot. See Dkt. 42, 44. At the Case
Management Conference, Defendants consented to Plaintiffs’ filing of a SAC, and the Parties will
present their respective jurisdictional arguments in expedited briefing on Defendants’ response to
the SAC. The Court ORDERS as follows for the reasons stated on the record:
1. Plaintiffs’ SAC is due by March 30, 2026.
2. Briefing on Defendants’ response to the SAC will take place on the following
schedule:
a. Defendants’ brief is due April 3, 2026.
b. Plaintiffs’ opposition is due April 10, 2026.
c. Defendants’ reply is due April 15, 2026.
d. The Court will set a hearing if necessary.
3. The Court will issue a separate order denying the motions at Dkts. 17, 38, and 43 to
relate this action to others.
Case 5:25-cv-10602-SVK Document 47 Filed 03/24/26 Page 1 of 2

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
4. The Court DEFERS a ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for expedited discovery at
Dkt. 45 until the Parties complete briefing on the jurisdictional issues in connection
with Defendants’ response to the SAC.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2026
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 5:25-cv-10602-SVK Document 47 Filed 03/24/26 Page 2 of 2