USA v. LEIBA et al

3:19-cr-00117Flnd21 août 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v. Case No. 3:19-cr-117-TKW-MAL
No. 3:26-cv-4896-TKW-MAL
SAM JONES, JR.,
Defendant.
_________________________________/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 194) and Defendant’s objection (Doc. 195). Based on the
Court’s de novo review of the issues raised in the objection, the Court agrees with
the magistrate judge that Defendant’s successive §2255 motion should be dismissed
because he did not get permission from the Eleventh Circuit to file it.
This is third successive §2255 motion that Defendant has filed,1 which is three
too many. Even if this motion raises different issues than were previously raised in
this case (and it is not clear that it does), that is immaterial because a defendant
generally only gets to file one §2255 motion and any claims that are not raised in
that motion are procedurally barred.
1 The first two successive §2255 motions were not styled as such, but that is how they
were treated because they collaterally attacked Defendant’s sentence. See Docs. 189, 191.
Case 3:19-cr-00117-TKW-MAL Document 196 Filed 08/21/26 Page 1 of 2
2
The Court did not overlook Defendant’s request that the motion be transferred
to the Eleventh Circuit “so [that court] may determine whether authorization should
be granted.” That request is denied. If Defendant wants the Eleventh Circuit to
decide whether to grant him authorization to file a second or successive §2255
motion, he will need to file an appropriate petition with that court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference into this Order.
2. Defendant’s §2255 motion (Doc. 192) is DISMISSED without
prejudice as unauthorized.
3. Defendant is warned that he may be subject to sanctions if he continues
to file motions challenging his conviction and sentence in this Court (under §2255
or otherwise) without having first received authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.
DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2026.
_________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:19-cr-00117-TKW-MAL Document 196 Filed 08/21/26 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.