WORKS v. MURPHY et al

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
ROBERT ROY TRICE WORKS,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 3:25-cv-1875-MCR-HTC
L. MURPHY,
Defendant.
___________________________/
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 25, 2026
(ECF No. 28). 	The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant
to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed
objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. 	Defendant Murphy’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.
Case 3:25-cv-01875-MCR-HTC Document 29 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
Case No. 3:25-cv-1875-MCR-HTC
3. 	This case is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff Works’s
failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
4. 	The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of October 2026.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-01875-MCR-HTC Document 29 Filed 10/08/26 Page 2 of 2