WATSON v. KERPSACK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
RAKIM JAMAL WATSON,
Plaintiff,
vs. Case No.: 3:25cv2188/LC/ZCB
JEREMY P. KERPSACK, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on January 20,
2026. (Doc. 10). The Court furnished the plaintiff a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title
28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of
the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections
thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 9) is DISMISSED under
28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii) and 1915A(b)(1)-(2) for failure to state a claim
1
Case 3:25-cv-02188-LC-ZCB Document 13 Filed 02/13/26 Page 1 of 2

on which relief may be granted and for seeking monetary relief against immune
Defendants.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with
this order and close the case.
DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2026.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 3:25-cv-02188-LC-ZCB Document 13 Filed 02/13/26 Page 2 of 2