MARLIN v. ANDREWS et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
EUGENE MARLIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. ANDREWS, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 5:24-cv-483-TES-ALS
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 52] to deny Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 34]
and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 45]. The parties have not filed a
timely objection or sought an extension of time to file an objection within the 14-day
period outlined in the magistrate judge’s R&R. [Doc. 52 at pp. 10–11]. Thus, the Court
reviews the R&R for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), in connection with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 6(a)(1) & (d).
Having considered the R&R, the Court finds no clear enumeration of error and
agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the United States Magistrate Judge’s R&R [Doc. 52] and
MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court DENIES
Case 5:24-cv-00483-TES-ALS Document 55 Filed 04/13/26 Page 1 of 2

2
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 34] and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
[Doc. 45].
SO ORDERED, this 13th day of April, 2026.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 5:24-cv-00483-TES-ALS Document 55 Filed 04/13/26 Page 2 of 2