USA v. Reynolds et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 26-CR-1003 CJW-MAR
Plaintiff,
vs. ORDER REGARDING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
CONCERNING DEFENDANT’S
GUILTY PLEA
AARON NATHANIEL REYNOLDS,
Defendant.
___________________
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
On March 25, 2026, a three-count Indictment was filed against defendant and one
other person. Defendant was charged in all 3 counts. On October 1, 2026, defendant
appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Roberts and entered a plea of
guilty to counts 1 & 3 of the Indictment. On October 1, 2026, Judge Roberts filed a
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommended defendant’s guilty plea
be accepted. The parties did not file objections to Judge Roberts’ R&R. The Court,
therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Judge Roberts’ recommendation to accept
defendant’s plea in this case.
II. ANALYSIS
Under the statute, this Court’s standard of review for a magistrate judge’s R&R is
as follows:
A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the
report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is
made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
Case 2:26-cr-01003-CJW-MAR Document 73 Filed 10/16/26 Page 1 of 2

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
When parties do not object to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation,
the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A). Similarly, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(b) provides for review
of a magistrate judge’s R&R on dispositive motions, where objections are made, as
follows:
The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the
recommendation, receive further evidence, or resubmit the matter to the magistrate
judge with instructions.
FED. R. CRIM. P. 59(b)(3).1
In this case, the parties filed no objections, and it appears to the Court upon review
that Judge Roberts’ findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Therefore, the
Court ACCEPTS Judge Roberts’ R&R of October 1, 2026, and ACCEPTS defendant’s
plea of guilty in this case to counts 1 & 3 of the Indictment.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of October, 2026.
________________________
C.J. Williams, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of Iowa
1 United States v. Cortez-Hernandez, 673 F. App’x 587, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam),
suggests that a defendant may have the right to de novo review of a magistrate judge’s
recommendation to accept a plea of guilty even if no objection is filed.
Case 2:26-cr-01003-CJW-MAR Document 73 Filed 10/16/26 Page 2 of 2