USA v. Pulido

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:25-cr-00224-AKB
Document 30 Filed 01/15/26 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
V.
JUAN PULIDO,
Defendant.
----------
Case No. 1:25-cr-00224-AKB-DKG
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 15, 2026, Defendant JUAN PULIDO appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge to enter a change of plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. (Dkt. 25). The Defendant executed a waiver of the right to have the presiding United States District Judge take his change of plea. Thereafter, the Court explained to the Defendant the nature of the charges contained in the Indictment (Dkt. 2), the maximum penalties applicable, his Constitutional rights, the impact that the Sentencing Guidelines will have, and that the District Judge will not be bound by the agreement of the parties as to the penalty to be imposed.
Having conducted the change of plea hearing and having inquired of the Defendant, defense counsel, and counsel for the government, the Court finds there is a factual basis for the Defendant's guilty plea, that it was entered it voluntarily and with full knowledge of the consequences, and that the plea should be accepted. The undersigned also ordered a pre-sentence investigation to be conducted and a report prepared by the United States Probation Office.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Case 1:25-cr-00224-AKB
Document 30 Filed 01/15/26 Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED:
1) The District Court accept Defendant JUAN PULIDO's plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment (Dkt. 2).
2) The District Court order forfeiture consistent with Defendant JUAN PULIDO's admission to the Criminal Forfeiture allegation in the Indictment (Dkt. 2) and the Plea Agreement (Dkt. 25).
3) The District Court detain Defendant pending sentencing.
Written objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14) days pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.1(b), or as a result of failing to do so, that party may waive the right to raise factual and/or legal objections to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
DATED: January 15, 2026
DÉBORA K. GRASHAM U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2