BENNETT v. WOOTEN et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
DWAYNE BENNETT, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) 1:24-cv-217
)
SERGEANT WOOTEN, and )
OFFICER HINTON, )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
On October 15, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice
was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 6,
7.) No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed
by Section 636.
Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation, (Doc. 6), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
Plaintiff’s federal law claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which
relief may be granted, and this court declines to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims.
Case 1:24-cv-00217-WO-JEP Document 8 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 9th day of February, 2026.
__________________________________
United States District Judge
Case 1:24-cv-00217-WO-JEP Document 8 Filed 02/09/26 Page 2 of 2