HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASHLIE SHANLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
1:24-CV-308-DAB-JLW
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Order and Recommendation
filed on January 16, 2026. (D.E. 18.) The Magistrate Judge recommends denying
without prejudice Plaintiff Jeremy Henderson’s motion to compel service (D.E. 14),
denying Mr. Henderson’s request for removal (D.E. 1-2), granting Defendant Ashlie
Shanley’s motion to dismiss (D.E. 10), and dismissing the Complaint without
prejudice. The deadline for objections passed on February 2, 2026, and no parties
have objected to the Recommendation.
Because there are no objections, the Court “must ‘only satisfy itself that there
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’”
Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 72 advisory committee’s note). This Court has accordingly
reviewed the Recommendation and concludes it contains no clear error.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
(D.E. 18) is ADOPTED, Mr. Henderson’s motion to compel service (D.E. 14) is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Mr. Henderson’s request for removal (D.E. 1-
2) is DENIED, Defendant Ashlie Shanley’s motion to dismiss (D.E. 10) is
GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with
this Order.
Case 1:24-cv-00308-DAB-JLW Document 20 Filed 02/12/26 Page 1 of 2

This the 12th day of February, 2026.
/s/ David A. Bragdon
United States District Judge
Case 1:24-cv-00308-DAB-JLW Document 20 Filed 02/12/26 Page 2 of 2