HINTON v. STEIN

1:25-cv-00711Ncmd12 janv. 2026

Texte intégral

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:25CV711
)
JOSHUA STEIN et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On August 13, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order
and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties
in 	accordance 	with 	28 	U.S.C. 	§ 	636(b). 	Objections 	were 	filed
within the time limits prescribed by section 636. 	(Doc. 6.).
The 	court 	has 	appropriately 	reviewed 	the 	portions 	of 	the
Magistrate 	Judge’s 	report 	to 	which 	objections 	were 	made 	and 	has
made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s
report. 	The 	court 	therefore 	adopts 	the 	Magistrate 	Judge’s
Recommendation.
IT 	IS 	THEREFORE 	ORDERED 	that 	this 	action 	is 	DISMISSED 	sua
sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the
§ 1983 forms, which corrects the defects.
/s/ 	Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
January 12, 2026
Case 1:25-cv-00711-TDS-LPA Document 8 Filed 01/12/26 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.