1:25-cv-00711•HINTON v. STEIN
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:25CV711 ) JOSHUA STEIN et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On August 13, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 6.). The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge January 12, 2026 Case 1:25-cv-00711-TDS-LPA Document 8 Filed 01/12/26 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.