5:05-cr-00009•USA v. Eckles et al
Texte intégral
O AO 247 (NC/W 03/08) Order Regarding M otion for Sentence Reduction UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina United States of America ) ) ) ) ) ) v. KATRINA SHAWNTA ECKLES, a/k/a "Trina" Case No: 5:05CR09-2 USM No: 19941-058 Date of Previous Judgment: December 18, 2006 Julia Mimms (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of ê the defendant í the Director of the Bureau of Prisons í the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: í DENIED. ê GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 135 months is reduced to 108 months . I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures) Previous Offense Level: 33 Amended Offense Level: 31 Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category: I Previous Guideline Range: 135 to 168 months Amended Guideline Range: 108 to 135 months II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE ê The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. í The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. í Other (explain): III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Upon release from imprisonment, and absent a residential plan accepted by the U.S. Probation Officer prior to release from incarceration, it is ordered that as a condition of supervised release the defendant shall submit to the local Residential Reentry Center for a period not to exceed 90 days, with work release, at the direction of the U.S. Probation Officer. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated December 18, 2006, shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Order Date: March 23, 2009 Effective Date: March 23, 2009 (if different from order date) Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 1178 Filed 03/23/09 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document 1178 Filed 03/23/09 Page 2 of 2
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
AO 247 (NC/W 03/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina United States of America Vv. Case No: 5:05CRO09-2 KATRINA SHAWNTA ECKLES, a/k/a "Trina" USM No: 19941-058 Date of Previous Judgment: December 18, 2006 Julia Mimms _S—¥&¥_#“/_——_ aS (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of Mi the defendant © the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: O DENIED. & GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 135 months is reduced to 108 months I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures) Previous Offense Level: 33 Amended Offense Level: 31 Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category: I Previous Guideline Range: 135 to 168 months Amended Guideline Range: 108 to 135 months Il. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE @ The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. © The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. 1 Other (explain): Il. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Upon release from imprisonment, and absent a residential plan accepted by the U.S. Probation Officer prior to release from incarceration, it is ordered that as a condition of supervised release the defendant shall submit to the local Residential Reentry Center for a period not to exceed 90 days, with work release, at the direction of the U.S. Probation Officer. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated December 18, 2006, shall remain in effect. IT ISSO ORDERED. Order Date: March 23, 2009 pte Loeb Effective Date: March 25. 2008 rder date) Richard L. Voorhees ee OPEL ES United States District Judge INFORMATION GPO ee 5:05-cr-00009-MEO-DCK Document1178 _ Filed 03/23/09 Page 1 of 2 Case 5:05-cr-O0009-MEO-DCK Document1178 _ Filed 03/23/09 Page 2 of 2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.