USA v. Rodriguez et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOSE GARCIA JIMENEZ,
Defendant.
4:25CR3041
ORDER
A telephone status conference was held today. Defendant moved to continue the
status conference for purposes of determining how he would like to proceed in this matter
and, further, to see how the pending Findings and Recommendation, pertaining to his
codefendant, is resolved. The government did not object. Based on the comments of
counsel, the court finds good cause has been shown and the oral motion to continue
should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) 	A telephonic conference with counsel will be held before the undersigned
magistrate judge at 9:00 a.m. on January 28, 2026 to discuss setting any
change of plea hearing or the date of the jury trial. Counsel for the parties
shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to participate
in the call.
2) 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends
of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional
time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time
between today’s date and on January 28, 2026, shall be deemed excludable
time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial
Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv). Failing to timely object to this
order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of
any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the
Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 29th day of December, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
United States Magistrate Judge
4:25-cr-03041-SMB-JMD Doc # 89 Filed: 12/29/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>