8:20-cr-00209•USA v. Sandoval et al
Texte intégral
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Nebraska United States of America ) ) ) ) ) ) v. SERVANDO V. URIAS Case No: 8:20-CR-209 USM No: 31763-047 Date of Original Judgment: 7/6/2023 Date of Previous Amended Judgment: Richard McWilliams (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 90 months is reduced to time served . (See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted) Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 7/6/2023 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Order Date: 1/28/2026 Judge’s signature Effective Date: Senior U.S. District Judge John M. Gerrard (if different from order date) Printed name and title 8:20-cr-00209-JMG-JMD Doc # 430 Filed: 01/28/26 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 2 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) This page contains information that should not be filed in court unless under seal. (Not for Public Disclosure) SERVANDO V. URIAS DEFENDANT: CASE NUMBER: 8:20-CR-209 DISTRICT: District of Nebraska I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures) Previous Total Offense Level: 30 Amended Total Offense Level: 28 Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category: I Previous Guideline Range: 97 to 121 months Amended Guideline Range: 78 to 97 months II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO THE AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a substantial assistance departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range. III. FACTORS CONSIDERED UNDER USSG § 1B1.10 AND 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (See Chavez-Meza v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1959 (2018)) The seriousness of the offense, respect for the law, and just punishment for this particular offense. 8:20-cr-00209-JMG-JMD Doc # 430 Filed: 01/28/26 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # <pageID>
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.