USA v. Medina-Diaz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANTONIO MEDINA-DIAZ,
Defendant.
8:25CR185
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial
Motions, (Filing No. 22). The motion is unopposed by the government. For good cause shown,
the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) 	Defendant’s Motion to Extend Deadline to File Pretrial Motions, (Filing No. 22), is
granted.
2) 	Pretrial motions shall be filed by November 21, 2025.
3) 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the
public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result
of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between November 14, 2025 and
November 21, 2025, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would
deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case.
The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this
court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should
not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
4) 	No additional extensions will be considered absent a request for hearing with the
undersigned Magistrate Judge and a showing of exceptional good cause.
Dated this 17th day of November, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ryan C. Carson
United States Magistrate Judge
8:25-cr-00185-RFR-RCC Doc # 23 Filed: 11/17/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>