Sedighi v. Farris Engineering

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MEISAM SEDIGHI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
FARRIS ENGINEERING, Inc. (Kate
Breitenfeld);
Defendant.
8:25CV500
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on two essentially identical Motions for
Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff on December 2 and December 8, 2025,
respectively. Filing Nos. 11 & 12. Plaintiff seeks to extend his deadline to file
an amended complaint by thirty days or until January 10, 2026.1 Plaintiff
submits that he needs additional time to prepare his amended complaint due
to his full-time employment, full-time student status, and medical condition,
due to which he sleeps between 10 to 12 hours on average. Plaintiff
represents that this is the “final extension” he is requesting. E.g., Filing No.
12 at 1. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motions for Extension of Time, Filing No. 11; Filing
No. 12, are granted. Plaintiff shall have until January 9, 2026, to file his
amended complaint.
2. The Clerk’s office is directed to terminate the previous pro se case
management deadline of December 10, 2025, and to set a pro se case
1 Plaintiff mistakenly requests an extension “up to and including January 10, 2025.” Filing No. 12 at
2 (emphasis omitted & italics added). The Court assumes Plaintiff means January 10, 2026, but that
date falls on a Saturday and is not an appropriate deadline.
8:25-cv-00500-JMG-PRSE Doc # 13 Filed: 12/09/25 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>

2
management deadline using the following text: January 9, 2026: check for
amended complaint.
Dated this 9th day of December, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________________
John M. Gerrard
Senior United States District Judge
8:25-cv-00500-JMG-PRSE Doc # 13 Filed: 12/09/25 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID #
<pageID>