Moody v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

1:16-cv-00021Nhd3 janv. 2017

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Dana E. Moody
v.
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Case No. 16-cv-00021-JL
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated November 28, 2016. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly
raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such
objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
____________________________
Date: January 3, 2017
cc: Kevin P. Polansky, Esq.
Dana E. Moody, pro se
Joseph N. Laplante
Chief, United States District Judge
Case 1:16-cv-00021-JL Document 56 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.