Hart v. Goulette et al

1:16-cv-00028Nhd29 août 2018

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Kenneth H. Hart
v.
Ryan Goulette, et al
Case No. 16-cv-28-PB
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated August 7,
2018 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the
magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and
those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’”
School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st
Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848
F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to
file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right
to appeal). For reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation,
the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 96), is granted.
Dr. Linda DeLorey’s Rule 54(b) motion (doc. no. 95), is denied as
Case 1:16-cv-00028-PB Document 104 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 2
moot. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.
/s/ Paul J. Barbadoro
Paul J. Barbadoro
United States District Judge
Date: August 29, 2018
cc: Kenneth H. Hart, pro se
Jonathan A. Lax, Esq.
Seth Michael Zoracki, Esq.
Case 1:16-cv-00028-PB Document 104 Filed 08/29/18 Page 2 of 2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.