1:17-cv-00202•Adams v. Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp.
Texte intégral
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Athena Adams v. Oakridge Direct Solutions Corp. Case No. 17-cv-202-AJ ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated August 29, 2018 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal) ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante Chief Judge Date: September 17, 2018 cc: John F. Skinner, III /s/ Joseph N. Laplante Case 1:17-cv-00202-AJ Document 16 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 1
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.