Rogers v. New Hampshire, State of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Scott N. Rogers
v.
New Hampshire, State of
Civil No. 17-cv-356-JD
O R D E R
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the
Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.
Johnstone dated September 15, 2017. “‘[O]nly those issues
fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved
by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No.
37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)
(quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d
271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-
Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice,
failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will
waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the
petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the
denial of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a
certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.§ 2253(c)(2); Rule
11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254;
Case 1:17-cv-00356-JD Document 13 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 2

First Cir. LR 22.0.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.
Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.
United Stated District Judge
Date: October 25, 2017
cc: Scott N. Rogers, pro se
Case 1:17-cv-00356-JD Document 13 Filed 10/25/17 Page 2 of 2