Roosevelt v. Ellis

1:25-cv-00302Nhd9 févr. 2026

Texte intégral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Theodore Roosevelt
v.
Sarah Ellis
Case No. 25-cv-302-JL-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated
December 3, 2025. 	“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the
objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the
district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded
on appeal.” 	Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10
(1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-
Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to
file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose
their right to appellate review.”).
____________________________
Joseph N. Laplante
United States District Judge
Date: February 9, 2026
cc: 	Theodore Rossevelt, pro se
Case 1:25-cv-00302-JL-TSM Document 5 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.