Moyer v. Murray et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
GREGORY ASHLEY MOYER, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CIV-25-429-SLP
)
JAMES V. MURRAY, Attorney at Law, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
O R D E R
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2), 60(b)(3), and 60(b)(6) [Doc. No. 81]. Upon review, the Court
notes that the filing contains protected information to include the names of one or more
individuals that appear to be minors. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of
Court is directed to seal the Amended Motion. The Court further directs Plaintiff to file a
redacted Amended Motion and only reference the initials of any minor child. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3). Plaintiff has been reminded of this requirement on prior occasions. See
Orders [Doc. Nos. 34 and 53]. Plaintiff’s continued refusal to comply with privacy
protection requirements is concerning and the Court will summarily strike any future
filings that fail to comply.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall seal Plaintiff’s
Amended Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2), 60(b)(3),
and 60(b)(6) [Doc. No. 81].
Case 5:25-cv-00429-SLP Document 82 Filed 04/06/26 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within seven days, or by April 13, 2026, Plaintiff
shall file a redacted version of his Amended Motion as directed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2026.
Case 5:25-cv-00429-SLP Document 82 Filed 04/06/26 Page 2 of 2