5:26-cv-00018•Harris v. Rogers
Texte intégral
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OLLIE DEWAYNE HARRIS, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-26-18-D ) DAVID ROGERS, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Petitioner, Ollie Dewayne Harris, Jr., appearing pro se, sought habeas relief from a state court conviction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). On January 13, 2026, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7], in which he recommends the transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, where jurisdiction also exists1 because Petitioner is challenging a conviction from a state court located in that judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The magistrate judge explained that the “federal district courts in Oklahoma have had a longstanding policy favoring transferring habeas actions to the district of conviction” because “in the event of any hearing, trial records, trial counsel 1 Jurisdiction exists in this Court because Petitioner is incarcerated in Lawton, Oklahoma. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Case 5:26-cv-00018-D Document 8 Filed 02/05/26 Page 1 of 2
for the prosecution and for Petitioner, as well as any necessary witnesses are more likely to be available in the district where the prosecution took place.” [Doc. No. 7, at 3]. Petitioner was expressly informed of his right to object to the Report, the procedure for doing so, and the consequences of failing to object. Petitioner has neither timely objected nor sought additional time to do so. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7]. In the interest of justice, the Court TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 th day of February, 2026. . DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge Case 5:26-cv-00018-D Document 8 Filed 02/05/26 Page 2 of 2
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.