Shekima T. Lewis

.»\
X.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA|
I
: CIVIL ACTION/
IN RE SHEKIMA T. LEWIS (DEBTOR) : NO. 05-6780
BANKRUPTCt CASE
: NO. 04-36778 KJC
MAR 0 72806;
Juan R. S&nchez, J, March 7,2006
Appellant/Debtor, Shekima T. Lewis ("Lewis"), asks this Court td detenriine whether the
Bankruptcy Court erred in determining the pre-confirmation funds held by the Chapter 13 Standing
Trustee should not be distributed to Lewis's counsel for outstanding legal fees owed. I will remaad-
the case because the record is unclear whether the Bankruptcy Court considered the various code
provisions related to attorneys' fees as administrative expenses and the proper distribution of such
funds prior to distribution back to the debtor.
FACTS
Lewis filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on December 20,2004. The BankruptcyCourt ,I
dismissed the case on November 22,2005 before confirming the bankruptcy plan because Lewis
•
failed to make timely payments to the Trustee. Prior to dismissal, Lewis's counsel, Jenkins and
dayman, filed a motion to approve distribution of pre-confirmation payments held by the Trustee
'
to counsel for outstanding legal fees. At the hearing held on November 22,2005, the Bankruptcy
I
Court stated that, despite there being no question as to the reasonableness of counsel fees and the
court having jurisdiction on post-dismissal issues, it would deny the motion because "in a case that's
dismissed, where there is no dispute about the reasonableness of vyhat counsel has charged or is
!
i ( E N T E R E D
M A R - 7 2006 j
CLERK OF COURT
Case 04-36778-elf Doc 67 Filed 03/09/06 Entered 03/09/06 14:29:55 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 5

asking for, I don't see a good reason for the Court to get involved." Hr'g Tr. 8, Nolv. 22,2005. In
a Memorandum filed December 12, 2005, the bankruptcy judge further reasoned 11 U.S.C. §
349(b)(3) requires property of the estate revert to the debtor upon dismissal of a case. Mem. 3, Dec.
12,2005. Therefore, "the debtor is free to dispose of these funds as applicable law would otherwise
permit" but is in no way relieved of any obligation for unpaid counsel fees. Id. Counsel can pursue
"available remedies for collection of such fees under applicable non-bankruptcy law in the
appropriate non-bankruptcy forum." Id. at 3-4.
•V:^:v!^> ' . . _ • _ , . •- -• . .
DISCUSSION • : - ; , - • • - • - •v.K.;,,^-™ — . • • , , . ,,.,,,.. p- - -
A federal district court has jurisdiction over final judgments, orders and decrees of
-bankruptcy- judges pursuant to 28-U.S.G; §§ 15&(a)(l)-and 1334.- A clearly erroneous standard-
applies to findings of fact, whereas conclusions of law are subject to de novo review. In re Sciliano,,
13 F.3d 748, 750 (3d Cir. 1994). I review the denial of attorneys' fees for abuse of discretion,
"which occurs if the court's ruling was founded on an error of law or clearly erroneous view of the
facts or misapplication of law to the facts." In re Gioiaso, 979 F.2d 956, 959 (3d Cir. 1992). The
parties do not dispute the bankruptcy judge's factual finding the counsel fee in this case is
reasonable. The only dispute is whether the bankruptcy judge erred in holding th<: court should not
consider wheth<£rt6 permit cbtiriset fees in dismissed cases prior to p^
The Bankruptcy Court correctly relied on 11 U.S.C. § 349(b)(3) for thje proposition any
property of an estate reverts to the debtor after dismissal of a bankruptcy case, The Bankruptcy
Code, however, also makes provisions for the Trustee to distribute payments For administrative
!
expenses prior to returning the funds to the debtor. Section 1326(a) expressly states "[i]f a plan is
not confirmed, the trustee shall return any such payments not previously paid aiid not yet due and
Case 04-36778-elf Doc 67 Filed 03/09/06 Entered 03/09/06 14:29:55 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 5

owing to creditors... to the debtor, after deducting any unpaid claim allowed.under section 503(b)."
11 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(2). Section 503(b) governs allowance of administrative ^xpenses generally and
expressly includes "compensation and reimbursement awarded under section 330(a) of this title."
11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2). Among the compensation listed in section 330(a) is "reasonable
compensation to the debtor's counsel for representing the interests of the debtor in connection with
a bankruptcy case." 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(4)(B).
Collectively, sections 330(a), 503(b) and 1326(a) permit attorneys' fees and other
,..,.•• ..:•,*«>••••."••• • . . , , , . . . , . . '
administrative expenses be deducted from funds held by the Trustee before ^ balance is returned
to the debtor, even when the case is dismissed before a plan is confirmed.1 The bankruptcy judge,
however, never discussed what impact, if any, the characterization of attorneys' fees as an
administrative expense has on section 349(b)(3)'s requirement of reversion of funds to the debtor.2
Although the Bankruptcy Court relied on section 349(b)(3) and raised justifiable concerns about
judicial administration, the record is not adequate to explain whether the disallowance of counsel's
requested fees was made in light of the Bankruptcy Code's language attorneys' fees may qualify as
'Courts have interpreted these provisions as requiring payment of administrative
expenses, which may include attorneys' fees, before reverting the funds to tt e debtor even when
a lanis not'cofflrmet" See,i,lMlMicm 2Wffiri^'l83tl1^ v:
a planis
2002) (reviewing statutory language of 1326(a)(2) as restrictive on section 349(b)(3)'s reversion
requirement when a plan is both confirmed and not confirmed); In re Doherty, 229 B.R. 461, 465
(Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1999) (holding section 1326(a)(3) sets clear statutory mindate to Trustee to
pay administrative expenses prior to reversion of funds to the debtor).
2The The Bankruptcy Court implicitly recognized attorneys' fees qualify as an
administrative expense when it determined it could consider counsel's moticfn for distribution of
pre-confirmation funds for legal expenses as an application for attorneys' fe^s or a request for
payment of administrative expense under section 503(b). The court questioned whether it had
authority to make an award to counsel because counsel did not file a fee application but found it
need not rule on this issue in light of section 11 U.S.C. § 349(b)(3).
Case 04-36778-elf Doc 67 Filed 03/09/06 Entered 03/09/06 14:29:55 Desc Main
Document Page 3 of 5

administrative expenses subject to disbursement prior to reversion of funds \o the debtor. Because
the Bankruptcy Court made no explicit reference to nor addressed the interaction of all the relevant
Code provisions, I am reluctant to rule on this issue in the absence of any record of such
consideration.
An appropriate Order follows.
Case 04-36778-elf Doc 67 Filed 03/09/06 Entered 03/09/06 14:29:55 Desc Main
Document Page 4 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE SHEKIMA T. LEWIS (DEBTOR)
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 05-6780
BANKRUPTCY CASE
NO. 04-36778 KJC
ORDER
AND NOW this 7th day of March, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED the November 22,2005 final
Order denying Appellant/Debtor's Motion to Approve the Distribution! of Pre-Confinnation
Payments Held by the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee to Debtor's Counsel for Outstanding Legal Fees
is VACATED and REMANDED to the Bonkruptcy Court to moke findinga and provide further
explanation to support its reasoning. Although the Bankruptcy Court relied on 11 U.S.C. § 349(b)(3)
to support its denial, it did not consider the impact of other relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code. Therefore, on remand, the Bankruptcy Court shall make appropriate findings as to whether
11 U.S.C. §§ 330(a), 503(b), and 1326(a) permit an award of attorneys' fees in cases dismissed prior
to plan confirmation and the timeliness of Appellant/Debtor's application for attorneys' fees filed
on February 7,2006 in light of 11 U.S.C. § 503(a).
BY THE COURT:
Case 04-36778-elf Doc 67 Filed 03/09/06 Entered 03/09/06 14:29:55 Desc Main
Document Page 5 of 5