MAXON ENGINEERING SERVICES INC and G&G Developers Corp. ("G&G")

3:04-bk-04781Prb23 nov. 2005

Texte intégral

1 Three opinions released contemporaneously with this opinion provide a more detailed account
of the relationships and claims involving these parties. See In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., No. 04-
04781 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (“PREPA’s Rule 9023 Motion to Reconsider, Alter,
Amend and for Additional Findings”); No. 04-04781, Adv. No. 05-00202 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov. 21,
2005) (PREPA’s “Motion to Dismiss”); No. 04-04781, Adv. No. 05-00202 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Nov.
21, 2005) (“Debtor’s Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction Directing PREPA to Pay
Outstanding Invoices”).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
In re: Bk. No. 04-04781-MWV
Chapter 11
Maxon Engineering Services, Inc.,
Debtor
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has before it a motion for relief from the automatic stay filed on September 16, 2005,
by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”). Maxon Engineering Services, Inc. (the
“Debtor”) filed its “Debtor’s Opposition to Request for Relief from the Automatic Stay Filed by PREPA”
on September 28, 2005, and the Court held a hearing on the matter on September 29, 2005.
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334
and 157(a) and the “Standing Order of Resolution for Bankruptcy Cases” dated July 19, 1994 (Torruella,
C.J.). This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).
BACKGROUND1
The Debtor is an engineering company that filed chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 5, 2004. The
Debtor performed substantial work for PREPA both prior to and after filing for bankruptcy. Through an
adversary proceeding, the Debtor has sought turnover of funds in excess of $500,000 for work performed
by the Debtor post-petition (the “post-petition funds”). PREPA, though, alleges that the Debtor is liable
Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main
Document Page 1 of 3
2 Unless otherwise noted, all statutory section references herein are to the Bankruptcy Reform
Act of 1978, as amended, 11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.
2
for damages that PREPA may have to pay as a result of a related suit brought against PREPA by Banco
Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (“BBVA”) arising from assigned contracts involving PREPA, BBVA, and the
Debtor. Essentially, PREPA erroneously disbursed checks payable only in the Debtor’s name when the
checks were supposed to be made payable to both the Debtor and BBVA. Anticipating the suit against it
by BBVA, PREPA placed an administrative hold on the post-petition funds owed the Debtor while
PREPA investigated BBVA’s claim. In the event that PREPA is found liable to BBVA, PREPA would
presumably seek to recover from the Debtor any damages paid to BBVA.
DISCUSSION
PREPA requests relief from the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(d)(1),2 which provides
relief from the stay “for cause.” PREPA argues that the “cause” in this case is that it has a colorable
claim of a right to set off the post-petition funds it owes Debtor against its claim against the Debtor arising
from BBVA’s suit against PREPA. The Court has since determined that PREPA has no right of setoff
because its claim against the Debtor is a prepetition claim, and a creditor may not use post-petition funds
to set off prepetition claims. See In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., No. 04-04781 (Bankr. D. Puerto
Rico Nov. 21, 2005) (“PREPA’s Rule 9023 Motion to Reconsider, Alter, Amend and for Additional
Findings”) (reconsidering and affirming its holding in In re Maxon Engineering Servs., Inc., (Bankr. D.
Puerto Rico Sept. 13, 2005)). PREPA, therefore, is not entitled to relief from the automatic stay.
CONCLUSION
PREPA’s “Motion to Lift Stay” is denied. This opinion constitutes the Court’s findings and
conclusions of law in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052. The Court will issue
Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main
Document Page 2 of 3
3
a separate final order consistent with this opinion.
DATED this 21st day of November, 2005, at Manchester, New Hampshire.
/s/ Mark W. Vaughn
Mark W. Vaughn
Chief Bankruptcy Judge
District of New Hampshire
Sitting by designation
Case:04-04781-MCF7 Doc#:810 Filed:11/23/05 Entered:11/23/05 13:50:31 Desc: Main
Document Page 3 of 3

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.