USA v. Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
§
v. § CASE NO: 5:25-CR-115-H-BV-1
§
PETE RYAN RODRIGUEZ §
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF GUILTY
BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The defendant, by consent and under the authority of United States v. Dees, 125
F.3d 261 (Sth Cir. 1997), appeared with counsel for the purpose of entering a guilty plea
under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. This Report and Recommendation is
submitted to the United States District Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). |
A. Recommendation regarding Guilty Plea
The defendant was placed under oath and examined in open court concerning the
subjects of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The defendant was
advised regarding each subject and affirmed his/her understanding of each subject.
Pursuant to a written plea agreement with the government, the defendant pled guilty to
Count One of the Superseding Information, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
2252A(a)(1) and (b)—Transportation of Child Pornography.
After examining the defendant under oath, I find that:
1. The defendant, upon advice of counsel, consented orally and in writing to enter
this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final approval and
sentencing by the presiding district judge:
Case 5:25-cr-00115-H-BV Document 46 Filed 12/17/25 Page 1 of 3 PageID <pageID>

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charges, including each
essential element of the offense(s) charged, and the associated penalties;
3. The defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea
agreement supplement;
4. The defendant understands all his/her constitutional and statutory rights and
wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right
to appear before a United States district judge;
5. The defendant’s plea is made freely and voluntarily:
6. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;
7. There is a factual basis to support this plea; and
8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant’s plea of guilty.
Based on these findings, I recommend that the defendant’s guilty plea be accepted, that
the defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly.
B. Recommendation regarding 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2)—release or
detention of a defendant pending sentence.
The defendant pled guilty to an offense that makes him subject to mandatory
detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). See 18 U.S.C. 3142 (f)(1)(A) & (E); see also
United States v. Fitzpatrick, 44 F. App’x 653 (Sth Cir. 2002).
The United States District Judge has the power to review my actions and possesses
final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if there are any objections to
these findings or any other action of the undersigned, the defendant is required to make
those known to the within fourteen (14) days of today.
Ne
Case 5:25-cr-00115-H-BV Document 46 Filed 12/17/25 Page 2 of 3 PageID <pageID>

Signed on December 17, 2025.
(Wk bp
AMANDA JAMY’ R. BURCH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 5:25-cr-00115-H-BV Document 46 Filed 12/17/25 Page 3 of 3 PageID <pageID>