Chappa v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANGELO DIVISION
BLANCHE C.,'
Plaintiff,
No. 6:24-CV-069-H
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge issued Fildings, Conclusions, and a
Recommendation @CR) that the plaintiff should be awarded $13,547.U in attomey fees.
Dkt. No. 22 at 5. No objections were filed.
Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews
the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error.
Serano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,975 F.3d488, 502 (5th Cft.
2020). The Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Coun accepts
and adopts the FCR.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff an attomey fee under
the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of $13,547.M. The defendant is
ordered to make the check payable to the plaintiff and to mail the check to the address of the
plaintiffs attomey, Howard D. Olinsky, at the following address:
I The plaintiffis identifired only by frrst name and last initial due to privacy concerns inherent in the
"sensitive personal information available to the public througlr opinions in Social Securiry cases."
Dkt. No. 22 at 1n.1.
Defendant.
Case 6:24-cv-00069-H-BU Document 23 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>

Olinsky Law Group
250 S. Clinton Street
Suite 210
Syracuse, New York 13202.
J--
So ordered on January \ ,ZOZO.
WESLEY HENDRIX
D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
J
Case 6:24-cv-00069-H-BU Document 23 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>