Ramos v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
FRANCISCO RAMOS, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§
V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-26-CV-04490-FB
§
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND §
PROTECTIVE SERVICES; KIMBERLY §
COFFEE; SHELLY DUGLOSCH; JIMMIE §
D. MITCHELL; and LUCINDA GARCIA §
VALDEZ, §
§
Defendants. §
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed
in the above-captioned cause on August 31, 2026. (ECF No. 16). To date, no objections to the Report
and Recommendation have been received.1
Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court
need not conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations
to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its
reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,
1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989).
1 Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 635(b)(1). If service upon a party is made by mailing
a copy to the party’s last known address, “service is complete upon mailing.” FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). If service is by electronic means, “service is
complete upon transmission.” Id. at (E).
Case 5:26-cv-04490-FB Document 20 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 16) is ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) such that this case
is DISMISSED for want of prosecution and failure to follow a court order.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot
and this case is CLOSED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED this 8th day of October, 2026.
_________________________________________________
FRED BIERY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
.
2
Case 5:26-cv-04490-FB Document 20 Filed 10/08/26 Page 2 of 2