CourtListener 3921734•Anonymous
Texte intégral
1
3
L.R curiam.
The balance upon this debt ioi'S'sd OV til*. verdict oí the jury, is a sum under
£. 20. 7,i
L-'f» bees; brought into this court by.au appeal from the county Court v;he it commenced. A part oí the act oí 1786, ch. 14, see.
,
is in these’words : “Provided, that no suit shall be commenctii “ the first instance returnable to any court for atiy sum uc;k 2G.” Articles were delivered to the plaintiff and charged, by the defendant; for the delivery of which there was no stipu-. jUti-ui in the bond, which was for money j and the jury allowed tiu-m*. and the presumption is, tint, they allowed them as set offs. Tncn the rule is, that ií
a
larger sum is reduced by pay.* meats under
£.
20, the court will order a,non-suit upon a verdict, ascertaining ihe sum to be under
f. 20}
"because, piaintiff knowing of these, should have credit given for them, and consequently must have known the amount oí the balance; but i.f only reduced bv set offs, the com t will not order a norsuit, because plaintiff could not kno w at the'time of bringing his.action> whether the defendant would set off or not. ...
judgment for the plaintiff.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.