CourtListener 10309505•Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom
Texte intégral
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT
In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold
Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following
order:
Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the
memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has
not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014).
Affirmed.
MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.
Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.