In the Matter of Robert Dovey, Board of Education of Delanco Township, Burlington County, 7/7/2022, (#162-22SEC)

SEC Dkt. No. T13-21
Agency Dkt. No. 124-5/22
New Jersey Commissioner of Education
Final Decision
In the Matter of D. Robert Dovey,
Delanco Township Board of Education,
Burlington County.
The Commissioner has reviewed the record of this matter and the decision of the
School Ethics Commission (SEC), finding that respondent violated the School Ethics Act for
failure to timely complete board member training in accordance with N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and
N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1. The SEC’s decision was forwarded to the Commissioner for final
determination on the recommended penalty pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c). The SEC
recommended a sanction of removal effective upon the adoption of the decision by the
Commissioner. Alternatively, if the respondent completed the required training before the
issuance of the Commissioner’s final decision, the SEC recommended that respondent be
suspended for 30 days. Respondent failed to complete the training. Respondent has neither
filed exceptions to the recommended penalty nor instituted an appeal of the SEC’s underlying
finding of violation pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:4-1 et seq.
Upon review, the Commissioner concurs with the penalty recommended by the SEC for
respondent’s failure to timely honor an obligation placed upon board members by law.
162-22SEC

2
Accordingly, as of the filing date of this decision, respondent is removed from the board for
violating the School Ethics Act.
IT IS SO ORDERED.1
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Date of Decision:
Date of Mailing:
1 This decision may be appealed to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:6-9.1.
Under N.J.Ct.R. 2:4-1(b), a notice of appeal must be filed with the Appellate Division within 45 days from the date
of mailing of this decision.
July 7, 2022
July 8, 2022

1
Before the School Ethics Commission
Docket No.: T13-21
Decision for Failure to Complete Mandatory Training
Requirement in a Timely Manner
I/M/O D. Robert Dovey,
Delanco Township Board of Education, Burlington County
I. 	Procedural History
This matter arises from an Order to Show Cause (OTSC) that was issued by the School
Ethics Commission (Commission) at its meeting on April 16, 2022, and also served on April 26,
2022, via electronic mail.1 The OTSC directed D. Robert Dovey (Respondent), a “board member”
as defined in N.J.S.A. 18A:12-23 of the School Ethics Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 18A:12-21 et seq., to
show cause as to why the Commission should not find him in violation of the Act, for failing to
complete training as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1.
In the OTSC served on April 26, 2022, the Commission notified Respondent that he had
twenty (20) days to respond to the OTSC, and further advised that failure to respond would be
deemed an admission of the facts set forth in the OTSC. Respondent was also notified that, upon
receipt of the response or upon expiration of the twenty (20) day time period for so filing, the
Commission may proceed to a determination of a violation on a summary basis (i.e., without a
hearing or further proceedings) in accordance with N.J.A.C. 6A:28-1.6(c), which so permits when
material facts are not in dispute.
II. 	Analysis
The Act was enacted by the New Jersey State Legislature to ensure and preserve public
confidence in members of local boards of education and local school administrators. N.J.S.A.
18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1 require every board member to complete a training program
prepared and offered by the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA).
Respondent is a member of the Delanco Township Board of Education (Board), located in
Burlington County. As a result of his position on the Board, and in accordance with N.J.S.A.
18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1, Respondent is required to complete a mandated training
program on an annual basis. For convenience and ease, the training is offered online so any board
member may complete it at any time, from anywhere. Respondent was required to complete the
Governance 1 training program by December 31, 2021.
On or April 15, 2022, NJSBA provided the Commission with the names of those board of
education members who failed to complete mandated training by December 31, 2021, and the list
provided included Respondent. Prior to this time, multiple communications about mandated training
1 As a result of the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and the implementation of electronic filing,
service of process was effectuated by the Commission through electronic transmission only.

2
were sent to Respondent from NJSBA through a variety of means, including targeted e-mail
messages and postings in School Board Notes. More specific information detailing the outreach
efforts of NJSBA to communicate with Respondent and/or the charter school lead about mandated
training is set forth in the attached Certification from NJSBA. Notwithstanding all of these
communications, Respondent did not complete mandated training.
In light of Respondent’s failure to complete mandated training, an OTSC was issued by the
Commission, and served on Respondent, via electronic mail, on April 26, 2022.
To date, there is no dispute that Respondent did not complete his required training by
December 31, 2021, and did not complete the training prior to the issuance of the Commission’s
OTSC. After having been served with the OTSC, Respondent failed to respond to the Commission’s
OTSC as to why he did not complete training by December 31, 2021, and also failed to complete
training as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1.
III. 	Decision/Penalty Recommendation
N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.2(d) provides that school board members and charter school trustees who
fail to comply with their training mandate shall be considered in violation of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33.
Based on the record as set forth above, at its meeting on May 24, 2022, the Commission found that
Respondent violated N.J.S.A. 18A:12-33 and N.J.A.C. 6A:28-4.1. Respondent received repeated
notifications of his training requirement, and had ample opportunity to complete the mandated
training in a timely fashion; nonetheless, he failed to complete training as required. Where a
violation of the Act is found by the Commission, the Commission may recommend to the
Commissioner of Education that a penalty be imposed. The recommended penalty can include a
reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal of the school official. N.J.A.C. 6A:28-10.12.
For the reasons set forth above, and because training is regularly completed annually and
can be completed from any computer or device with an internet connection, the Commission
recommends that the Commissioner of Education impose a penalty of removal, with such removal
to become effective immediately upon issuance of the Commissioner of Education’s decision.
However, if Respondent completes training before the Commissioner of Education adopts a final
decision (which will be forty-five (45) days after the mailing date of the within decision), then the
Commission recommends that the Commissioner of Education, in lieu of removal, impose a thirty
(30) day suspension, with such suspension to become effective immediately upon issuance of the
Commissioner of Education’s decision.
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:12-29(c), this decision shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of
Education for review of the Commission’s recommended penalty. Respondent may either: 1) file
exceptions to the recommended sanction; 2) file an appeal of the Commission’s finding of a
violation; or 3) file both exceptions to the recommended sanction together with an appeal of the
finding of a violation.
Parties taking exception to the recommended sanction of the Commission but not disputing
the Commission’s finding of a violation may file, within thirteen (13) days from the date the
Commission’s decision is forwarded to the Commissioner, written exceptions regarding the
recommended penalty to the Commissioner. The forwarding date shall be the mailing date to the
parties, as indicated below. Such exceptions must be forwarded to: Commissioner of Education, c/o

3
Bureau of Controversies and Disputes, P.O. Box 500, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, marked
“Attention: Comments on Ethics Commission Sanction.”2 A copy of any comments filed must be
sent to the Commission (school.ethics@doe.nj.gov) and all other parties.
Parties seeking to appeal the Commission’s finding of violation must file an appeal pursuant
to the standards set forth at N.J.A.C. 6A:4:1 et seq. within thirty (30) days of the filing date of the
decision from which the appeal is taken. The filing date shall be three (3) days after the date of
mailing to the parties, as shown below. In such cases, the Commissioner’s review of the
Commission’s recommended sanction will be deferred and incorporated into the Commissioner’s
review of the finding of violation on appeal. Where a notice of appeal has been filed on or before
the due date for exceptions to the Commission’s recommended sanction (thirteen (13) days from the
date the decision is mailed by the Commission), exceptions need not be filed by that date, but may
be incorporated into the appellant’s briefs on appeal.
______________________________
Robert W. Bender, Chairperson
Mailing Date: May 24, 2022
2 An electronic submission may also be sent to controversiesdisputesfilings@doe.nj.gov.