A-1-CA-37789 | Omnilex

Texte intégral

Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation
Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey.
1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. 	No. A-1-CA-37789
5 AMANDA SANCHEZ,
6 	Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
8 Kenneth Martinez, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General·
10 	Santa Fe, NM
11 	for Appellee
12 Joseph Sullivan
13 	Albuquerque, NM
14 for Appellant
15
16 VARGAS,Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 {l} 	Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
19 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
20 	{2} 	AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/8/2019 10:46 AM

1 {3} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.
~ 	~;iG~
4 WE CONCUR:
5 -+------=~:..i....,...~..,__...Ll,,,,,<~.=.lo...~,..__-
6 L
2

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/8/2019 10:46 AM

hh

Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court’s discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation rk R. ol
Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey. , a eynolls

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2| STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

Aly. No. A-1-CA-37789
5] AMANDA SANCHEZ,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7] APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
| Kenneth Martinez, District Judge

9|| Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General:
10}|Santa Fe, NM

11||for Appellee

12}|Joseph Sullivan
13} Albuquerque, NM

141 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16| VARGAS, Judge.

17/3 Summary affirmance was ptoposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
18] proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
19}/been filed and the time for doing so has expired. |

2012; AFFIRMED.

1}g; ITISSO ORDERED.

3 JUI

4) WE CONCUR:

August 8, 2019- State of New Mexico v. Amanda Sanchez, No. A-1-CA-37789

Texte intégral

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude