1998 OK JUD ETH 3•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-3
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-3
1998 OK JUD ETH 3Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel26 mars 1998
Texte intégral
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-3
1998 OK JUD ETH 3
Decided: 03/26/1998
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
Cite as: 1998 OK JUD ETH 3, __ P.2d __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
Judicial Ethics Opinion 98-3
March 26, 1998
¶0 QUESTION: Is a sitting appointed judge required to resign in order to establish a committee, in order to prepare to run for a judicial election, under the guidelines of Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct? Is there a statutory mandate in either Title 26 Oklahoma Statute, Sec 5-101 et seq. or Title 20 Oklahoma Statute requiring such resignation?
¶1 ANSWER: Insofar as the Code of Judicial Conduct is concerned, we are of the opinion that Canon 5 does not require an appointed sitting judge to resign in order to prepare to run for judicial office. We believe however, that it is inappropriate for this panel to give an advisory opinion as to interpretation of these statutes which may impact the questions; our authority under Supreme Court Rule 55 is limited to opinions concerning the compliance of an intended future course of conduct with the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.